STEM-BASED INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECTS: REPERCUSSIONS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION

Authors

  • Diego Martins Gomes Revista Integralize Author
  • Flávio Lopes da Silva Filho Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63391/kz9vs738

Keywords:

STEM, interdisciplinarity, motivation, engagement, active learning

Abstract

STEM Education (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) has gained recognition as a relevant pedagogical approach for developing 21st-century skills, especially when articulated with interdisciplinary projects that promote active learning. This article analyzes how interdisciplinary STEM-based projects contribute to student engagement and motivation in Basic Education, considering theoretical foundations, empirical evidence, and implementation challenges. The theoretical framework discusses the historical development of STEM, the relevance of interdisciplinarity, and the educational potential of project-based methodologies, connecting these elements to theories of motivation and student engagement. The analysis shows that integrated practices enhance meaning in learning, increase autonomy, and stimulate critical thinking, as described by Deci and Ryan (2000), Fredricks, Blumenfeld and Paris (2004), and Bybee (2013). Research also indicates that learning environments centered on real-world challenges strengthen students’ persistence, interest, and participation. However, limitations remain, such as insufficient teacher training and fragmented curricula. It is concluded that interdisciplinary projects grounded in STEM significantly foster engagement and motivation, provided they are supported by teacher professional development, collaborative planning, and adequate institutional conditions.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

References

BEANE, James A. Curriculum integration: designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1997.

BELLANCA, James. 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press, 2011.

BYBEE, Rodger W. The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities. Arlington: NSTA Press, 2013.

BYBEE, Rodger W. STEM education now more than ever. Arlington: NSTA Press, 2018.

DECI, Edward L.; RYAN, Richard M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1985.

DECI, Edward L.; RYAN, Richard M. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2000.

DEWEY, John. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan, 1938.

DRAKE, Susan M.; REID, Jennifer L. Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 31–50, 2018.

FAZENDA, Ivani Catarina Arantes. Interdisciplinaridade: história, teoria e pesquisa. 2. ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2011.

FAZENDA, Ivani Catarina Arantes. Dicionário em construção: interdisciplinaridade. 3. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2014.

FREDRICKS, Jennifer A.; BLUMENFELD, Phyllis C.; PARIS, Alison H. School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational

Research, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 1, p. 59–109, 2004.

HMELO-SILVER, Cindy E.; DUNCAN, Ravit G.; CHINN, Clark A. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 2, p. 99–107, 2007.

HONEY, Margaret; PEARSON, Greg; SCHWEINGRUBER, Heidi (org.). STEM integration in K–12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2014.

MORIN, Edgar. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. A framework for K–12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. The future of education and skills: education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018.

PAPERT, Seymour. Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, 1980.

SANTOS, Rosana; FIGUEIREDO, Luciana. Metodologias ativas na educação básica: impactos e possibilidades. Revista Brasileira de Educação, [s. l.], v. 25, p. 1–20, 2020.

STIPEK, Deborah J. Motivation to learn: integrating theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.

THOMAS, John W. A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael: Autodesk Foundation, 2000.

WANG, Ming-Te; DEGOL, Jessica L. Gender gap in STEM: current knowledge, implications and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, [s. l.], v. 29, p. 119–140, 2016.

YAKMAN, G. STEAM Education: An Overview of Creating a Model of Integrative Education. PATT-19 Conference, Netherlands, 2008.

YAKMAN, Georgette. STEAM education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. In: PATT-19 CONFERENCE, 2008, Netherlands. Proceedings… Netherlands, 2008.

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Section

TECNOLOGIA

How to Cite

STEM-BASED INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECTS: REPERCUSSIONS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION. (2026). International Integralize Scientific, 6(56). https://doi.org/10.63391/kz9vs738

Most read articles by the same author(s)